In the executive agency that managed Expo Memorial Park (Osaka Prefecture Suitashi), the prefecture allowed the abolition on the second and clarified the idea of inheriting this park as prefecture Itona park of "Japanese exposition commemoration mechanism" in which the country was coming up with the abolition policy until the coming year.
"Informal social gathering of what should be of the tela of the Expo commemoration mechanism" made from the country, the prefecture, and Suitashi and economic circles and the clarification lingua.
The use discussion of "Exposition land" site of the park internal amusement park that closes due to the coaster accident starts in full scale by prefecture Itona making. A prefecture cultural section assumes, "Grope for the management solution so as not to cause the burden of the prefecture".
This mechanism is jurisdiction of Ministry of Finance, the country is 53%, and the prefecture is capital contributions as for 47%. The country assumed obtaining the consent of the prefecture to be an abolition condition about this mechanism in consideration of the Osaka Prefecture people's being familiarized to the park though the Cabinet Council was decided to the policy of the abolition in 2007.
When the park might be sold by the piece if privatized, the prefecture worries. However, posture with "If the purchase of land and the fund was able to be done free of charge, it is thought to assume the management mode of the prefecture subject" was shown from the judgment that the use of land did not advance like the current state.
Neither has arrived at the somatization though the plan that attracts the new stadium construction project of J League and GAMBA OSAKA and Theme Park of the U.S. major movie company has surfaced over the use plan of the park internal land.
The source
http://sankei.jp.msn.com/politics/local/090602/lcl0906021214001-n1.htm
"Informal social gathering of what should be of the tela of the Expo commemoration mechanism" made from the country, the prefecture, and Suitashi and economic circles and the clarification lingua.
The use discussion of "Exposition land" site of the park internal amusement park that closes due to the coaster accident starts in full scale by prefecture Itona making. A prefecture cultural section assumes, "Grope for the management solution so as not to cause the burden of the prefecture".
This mechanism is jurisdiction of Ministry of Finance, the country is 53%, and the prefecture is capital contributions as for 47%. The country assumed obtaining the consent of the prefecture to be an abolition condition about this mechanism in consideration of the Osaka Prefecture people's being familiarized to the park though the Cabinet Council was decided to the policy of the abolition in 2007.
When the park might be sold by the piece if privatized, the prefecture worries. However, posture with "If the purchase of land and the fund was able to be done free of charge, it is thought to assume the management mode of the prefecture subject" was shown from the judgment that the use of land did not advance like the current state.
Neither has arrived at the somatization though the plan that attracts the new stadium construction project of J League and GAMBA OSAKA and Theme Park of the U.S. major movie company has surfaced over the use plan of the park internal land.
The source
http://sankei.jp.msn.com/politics/local/090602/lcl0906021214001-n1.htm
コメントする