This time, the proposal to reduce the burden of the household related to child's high education.
The proportion of the education expense burden that occupies it to the household of Japan in the main 12 Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) countries is a level in 2nd place following South Korea of 22% and 30%. On the other hand, the Netherlands is 5% when saying in the low country, and Denmark is 4%. In addition, South Korea is pulled out, and the burden rate of Japan comes in 53% and 1st place in the high education after the period of the compulsory education.
The household burden of the high education is large in Japan because the college tuition keeps going up.
For instance, delivery money is reaching too much for 800,000 yen in total about the tuition 500,000 yen and the entrance fee 300,000 yen now at the first year of National Universities that was less than 100,000 yen until the first half of the 70's. When the income group is divided into five stages, this delivery money reaches 26% of annual earnings of the first low stage. The gap of a burden four times every 7% in the household in the fifth highest stage near is caused.
And, a high household burden gives birth to the following evils.
(1)The household that fears the education expense burden doesn't bear the child, and the falling birthrate is invited.
(2)It leads to the gap fixation differing even if the entering college rate according to the income stage is the same result.
(3)A heavy education expense burden to the household presses other spendings, and domestic demand stagnation is caused.
Therefore, I propose the following two.
(1)School expenses and the entrance fee as big as state or public : to the sliding scale system corresponding to the income.
(2)The benefit type scholarship is increased for private Oo.
(1)It peels off, The University of Tokyo has already adopted a part of ,, and it exempts from tuition of the student at home of less than annual earnings four million yen. (2)It has, it is said by the foreign country of Sho Grant, and the scholarship without the repayment obligation is increased, and there is figure ..the evil cancellation... University students are 2.5 million people now. When 500,000 yen a year is assisted to the student of 20% by the immunity and the scholarship of school expenses, necessary financial resources are 250 billion yen sooner or later. I think that no impossible amount when thinking about Valence with other public investments etc.
It is thought that the following can be achieved if it does so.
(1)Relaxation of falling birthrate. The charge of the high education is reduced, and the wall of the third person is broken.
(2)The child of the low-income household comes to be able also to go on to school, and it contributes to the gap correction.
(3)Cutting down the education expense burden leads to the increasing domestic demand.
It is necessary to solve various difficulties at the same time to only money insufficient, the press of a healthy competition for intercollegiate, You bet it is improving the education effect, and learning of the low-income household the possibility of entering college, etc. , too.
However, I feel that it is strong with the occasion to which the education is received as children are equivalent should, and it thinks the lowering the price of the high education for that to be indispensable the birth in what kind of home. Please how should be done the education investments to children in the whole society, and send the opinion to jp every day. (- Kazuyo = economic analyst)
- Source http://mainichi.jp/life/housing/news/20090517ddm013100041000c.html
The proportion of the education expense burden that occupies it to the household of Japan in the main 12 Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) countries is a level in 2nd place following South Korea of 22% and 30%. On the other hand, the Netherlands is 5% when saying in the low country, and Denmark is 4%. In addition, South Korea is pulled out, and the burden rate of Japan comes in 53% and 1st place in the high education after the period of the compulsory education.
The household burden of the high education is large in Japan because the college tuition keeps going up.
For instance, delivery money is reaching too much for 800,000 yen in total about the tuition 500,000 yen and the entrance fee 300,000 yen now at the first year of National Universities that was less than 100,000 yen until the first half of the 70's. When the income group is divided into five stages, this delivery money reaches 26% of annual earnings of the first low stage. The gap of a burden four times every 7% in the household in the fifth highest stage near is caused.
And, a high household burden gives birth to the following evils.
(1)The household that fears the education expense burden doesn't bear the child, and the falling birthrate is invited.
(2)It leads to the gap fixation differing even if the entering college rate according to the income stage is the same result.
(3)A heavy education expense burden to the household presses other spendings, and domestic demand stagnation is caused.
Therefore, I propose the following two.
(1)School expenses and the entrance fee as big as state or public : to the sliding scale system corresponding to the income.
(2)The benefit type scholarship is increased for private Oo.
(1)It peels off, The University of Tokyo has already adopted a part of ,, and it exempts from tuition of the student at home of less than annual earnings four million yen. (2)It has, it is said by the foreign country of Sho Grant, and the scholarship without the repayment obligation is increased, and there is figure ..the evil cancellation... University students are 2.5 million people now. When 500,000 yen a year is assisted to the student of 20% by the immunity and the scholarship of school expenses, necessary financial resources are 250 billion yen sooner or later. I think that no impossible amount when thinking about Valence with other public investments etc.
It is thought that the following can be achieved if it does so.
(1)Relaxation of falling birthrate. The charge of the high education is reduced, and the wall of the third person is broken.
(2)The child of the low-income household comes to be able also to go on to school, and it contributes to the gap correction.
(3)Cutting down the education expense burden leads to the increasing domestic demand.
It is necessary to solve various difficulties at the same time to only money insufficient, the press of a healthy competition for intercollegiate, You bet it is improving the education effect, and learning of the low-income household the possibility of entering college, etc. , too.
However, I feel that it is strong with the occasion to which the education is received as children are equivalent should, and it thinks the lowering the price of the high education for that to be indispensable the birth in what kind of home. Please how should be done the education investments to children in the whole society, and send the opinion to jp every day. (- Kazuyo = economic analyst)
- Source http://mainichi.jp/life/housing/news/20090517ddm013100041000c.html
はてなに追加
MyYahoo!に追加
del.icio.usに追加
livedoorClipに追加
コメントする